Real engagements. Honest outcomes.
All engagements are anonymised. The details that matter — the diagnosis, the evidence, and what happened next — are preserved.
How commercial intelligence redirected investment to a better return.
We were engaged to develop a go-to-market strategy. Our commercial diagnostic identified a higher-value opportunity already in the portfolio — and gave the client the evidence to act on it decisively.
The Brief
Develop a go-to-market strategy and launch plan for a new consumer product. The client had a defined timeline and a budget ready to deploy.
What We Found
The new product faced a smaller addressable market, unfavourable unit economics, and three well-positioned competitors. An existing portfolio line serving the same channels offered significantly better margin and a clearer path to growth.
The Outcome
Budget was redirected to the higher-margin portfolio line. The client deployed the same resources — with a clear strategy and a better commercial case behind them.
“The right analysis doesn’t just validate the plan — it finds where the real opportunity is.”
The diagnostic
The engagement began with a commercial diagnostic — our standard starting point before any strategy work. We quantified the addressable market from first principles, mapping the category, the realistic buyer universe, and actual purchase behaviour. The internal projection had conflated total category size with reachable demand.
We assessed the unit economics at the price point the product required to be competitive. The margin structure depended on volume assumptions that the distribution reality couldn’t support. A competitive price point and a profitable price point weren’t the same number.
The competitive audit identified three established players with stronger buyer relationships and better route-to-market economics. Alongside this, we mapped an existing portfolio line serving the same channels — underleveraged, higher margin, with a more direct path to the same buyers.
The result
The recommendation was evidence-led and specific: redirect the earmarked launch budget toward the existing higher-margin line, with a defined go-to-market strategy for that product instead. Same budget, same channels, better commercial fundamentals.
The client had invested time and resource in the original direction. The diagnostic gave them the clarity to reallocate with confidence — backed by sourced market data, verified unit economics, and a clear competitive rationale.
The client acted on it. Resources were deployed where the return was real — and the go-to-market work followed with a product the market was ready to receive.
AI readiness before AI investment.
A professional services firm wanted to implement AI to surface answers from their document library. We defined exactly what needed to happen first — and within 90 days, the implementation was live.
The Brief
Assess the viability of implementing an AI system to help staff find answers in a large internal document library faster and more reliably.
What We Found
The documents existed but weren’t ready: inconsistent naming, mixed versions, no clear ownership, and no defined workflow for the specific use case the technology needed to serve.
The Outcome
We delivered a 90-day readiness roadmap with clear milestones. The client completed the foundation work on schedule and launched the implementation with a well-defined use case and a system built to last.
“The tool was right. The data wasn’t ready. Those are two different problems.”
The diagnostic
The firm had a clear instinct: staff were spending too long searching for information that should have been easy to find. An AI system that could surface answers from their document library was the obvious solution. The instinct was sound. The readiness assessment told a more nuanced story.
We ran our three-question readiness framework: Do you have the data? Is it clean and organised? Do you know the specific workflow you’re solving for? The first answer was yes. The second and third identified clear gaps — the kind that, if addressed upfront, make the difference between an implementation that delivers and one that needs to be rebuilt.
The document library had accumulated over years without consistent naming conventions, version control, or ownership. Multiple versions of the same document coexisted. The “use case” was loosely defined as “finding things faster” — which isn’t specific enough to build an evaluation framework, let alone a system.
The result
We delivered a 90-day readiness roadmap: a prioritised programme to rationalise the document library, define a single high-value workflow as the initial use case, and establish the governance needed for the system to perform reliably over time.
We defined what “ready to build” looked like in specific, measurable terms — so the client had a clear target and the confidence that hitting it meant the implementation would succeed. That gave them a programme to execute, not just a list of concerns.
Three months later, the document library was consolidated, the workflow was defined, and content ownership was established. The implementation launched on the foundation we’d specified — and delivered the performance the business needed from day one.
Every engagement starts with a conversation.
A 30-minute call is enough to understand what you’re dealing with — and whether we’re the right people to help you address it.
Book a Discovery Call